|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| ==Introduction==
| |
| The Test Double Sample is part of the [[Test_Unit_Samples|STRIDE Test Unit Samples]].
| |
|
| |
|
| == Building and Running the Samples == | | ==Tests Description== |
| Please refer to the section appropriate for your target build environment:
| |
|
| |
|
| *[[Building and Running Test Unit Samples Under Windows| Windows Off-Target]]
| | '''''Note:''''' It is recommended that you read the [[Using Test Doubles]] article before proceeding in order to understand the concepts. |
|
| |
|
| *[[Building and Running Test Unit Samples Under Linux|Linux]]
| | === Basic === |
|
| |
|
| *[[Building and Running Test Unit Samples Under WinMobile|WinMobile]]
| | ====Test Function==== |
| | |
| ==Test Double Sample== | |
| | |
| Once you have built the sample target application and executed its tests, you can take time to peruse the test double source and the corresponding results that each produces. This section provides a brief description for each. <br>'''''Note:''''' It is recommended that you read the [[Using Test Doubles]] article before proceeding in order to understand the concepts.
| |
| | |
| ===01_01_Cpp_Test_Function===
| |
|
| |
|
| This example uses a '''C++ test class''' to validate the '''test_func1''' function under test. The dependency '''depend1''' is left in place during the '''CallNoDoubling''' method. The dependency is replaced with a fake method, which simply returns a constant in the '''CallWithFake''' method. The dependency is replaced with a mock method, which validates the passed in parameter, in the '''CallWithMock''' method.<br> | | This example uses a '''C++ test class''' to validate the '''test_func1''' function under test. The dependency '''depend1''' is left in place during the '''CallNoDoubling''' method. The dependency is replaced with a fake method, which simply returns a constant in the '''CallWithFake''' method. The dependency is replaced with a mock method, which validates the passed in parameter, in the '''CallWithMock''' method.<br> |
| The intercept mangling parameters in this example, in the [[Function_Double#Configuring_the_Double_Using_SCL|scl_function pragma]], uses the '''"DEFINITION"''' option to indicate the the intercept will be at the function definition, and the'''"IMPLICIT"''' option because no mangling is required to intercept (because the caller and callee are in separate compilation units). | | The intercept mangling parameters in this example, in the [[Function_Double#Configuring_the_Double_Using_SCL|scl_function pragma]], uses the '''"DEFINITION"''' option to indicate the the intercept will be at the function definition, and the'''"IMPLICIT"''' option because no mangling is required to intercept (because the caller and callee are in separate compilation units). |
|
| |
|
| ===01_02_Cpp_Test_Function_With_Depend=== | | ====Test Function With Depend==== |
| This example uses a '''C++ test class''' to validate the '''test_func2''' function under test. The dependency '''depend2''' is left in place during the '''CallNoDoubling''' method. The dependency is replaced with a fake method, which simply returns a constant in the '''CallWithFake''' method. The dependency is replaced with a mock method, which validates the passed in parameter, in the '''CallWithMock''' method.<br> | | This example uses a '''C++ test class''' to validate the '''test_func2''' function under test. The dependency '''depend2''' is left in place during the '''CallNoDoubling''' method. The dependency is replaced with a fake method, which simply returns a constant in the '''CallWithFake''' method. The dependency is replaced with a mock method, which validates the passed in parameter, in the '''CallWithMock''' method.<br> |
| The intercept mangling parameters in this example, in the [[Function_Double#Configuring_the_Double_Using_SCL|scl_function pragma]], uses the '''"REFERENCE"''' option to indicate the the intercept will be at the function call, and the'''"EXPLICIT"''' option because mangling is required to intercept (because the caller and callee reside in the same source file). | | The intercept mangling parameters in this example, in the [[Function_Double#Configuring_the_Double_Using_SCL|scl_function pragma]], uses the '''"REFERENCE"''' option to indicate the the intercept will be at the function call, and the'''"EXPLICIT"''' option because mangling is required to intercept (because the caller and callee reside in the same source file). |
|
| |
|
| ===02_01_C_Test_Function===
| |
| This example uses a '''C test class''' to validate the '''test_func1''' function under test. The dependency '''depend1''' is left in place during the '''CallNoDoubling''' method. The dependency is replaced with a fake method, which simply returns a constant in the '''CallWithFake''' method. The dependency is replaced with a mock method, which validates the passed in parameter, in the '''CallWithMock''' method.<br>
| |
| The intercept mangling parameters in this example, in the [[Function_Double#Configuring_the_Double_Using_SCL|scl_function pragma]], uses the '''"DEFINITION"''' option to indicate the the intercept will be at the function definition, and the'''"IMPLICIT"''' option because no mangling is required to intercept (because the caller and callee are in separate compilation units).
| |
|
| |
| ===02_02_C_Test_Function_With_Depend===
| |
| This example uses a '''C test class''' to validate the '''test_func2''' function under test. The dependency '''depend2''' is left in place during the '''CallNoDoubling''' method. The dependency is replaced with a fake method, which simply returns a constant in the '''CallWithFake''' method. The dependency is replaced with a mock method, which validates the passed in parameter, in the '''CallWithMock''' method.<br>
| |
| The intercept mangling parameters in this example, in the [[Function_Double#Configuring_the_Double_Using_SCL|scl_function pragma]], uses the '''"REFERENCE"''' option to indicate the the intercept will be at the function call, and the'''"EXPLICIT"''' option because mangling is required to intercept (because the caller and callee reside in the same source file).
| |
|
| |
| ===Command Line Execution===
| |
|
| |
| Command line execution for the Test Double sample is done using the [[Test_Runners#TestUnitRun.pl|TestUnitRun utility]]. Here are several examples of specific syntax to execute the sample. All of these commands can be invoked from a standard [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Command_Prompt_(Windows) command shell] (or other shell of your choosing) and the arguments shown assume that the commands are executed with the sample's directory as the starting directory. You must have your TestDouble.exe application running in order for the runner to be able to initiate a connection to the target simulator. In addition, you should verify that your %STRIDE_DIR%\bin\transport.cfg file is using the TCP transport to connect to port 8000 (these are the default settings when the product is installed).
| |
|
| |
| ====Simple execution of all test units====
| |
|
| |
| The following command executes all of the test units found in the STRIDE database you have previously generated. For the purpose of this sample, since there is only one database, the -d parameter is not strictly needed, but it is shown here for completeness.
| |
|
| |
| TestUnitRun.pl -d TestDouble.sidb
| |
|
| |
| This command executes all Test Units found in the database in descending alpha-numeric sort order. Any Test Unit initialization arguments are given default values (typically zero or NULL).
| |
|
| |
| When you run this command, you should see console output like:
| |
|
| |
| Attempting connection using [Sockets (S2)] transport ...
| |
| Connected to device.
| |
| Initializing STRIDE database objects...
| |
| Done.
| |
| Running Test C_Test_Function...
| |
| Running Test C_Test_Function_With_Depend...
| |
| Running Test CppTestFunction...
| |
| Running Test CppTestFunctionWithDepend...
| |
| Disconnected from device.
| |
| Test Results saved to C:\STRIDE\Samples\TestUnits\TestDouble\TestDouble.xml
| |
| Test Report saved to C:\STRIDE\Samples\TestUnits\TestDouble\TestDouble.html
| |
| ***************************************************************************
| |
| Results Summary
| |
| ***************************************************************************
| |
| Passed: 12
| |
| Failed: 0
| |
| In Progress: 0
| |
| Not Applicable: 0
| |
| ...in 4 suites.
| |
| ***************************************************************************
| |
|
| |
| ===Workspace-based Execution===
| |
|
| |
| TestDouble.ssw, a workspace in the TestDouble directory, demonstrates the use of script execution with Studio to manage test order and hierarchy. This workspace was created using [[WorkspaceSetup.pl]]. The setup and teardown folders provide basic infrastructure scripts that start/stop the simulator application (TestDouble.exe) and to manage traceviews used for [[Runtime_Reference#Logging_Services|srPrint]] message collection. The scripts that drive the testing are in the workspace '''test''' folder. What follows is a brief description for each.
| |
|
| |
| ====RunAll====
| |
|
| |
| This folder contains a script, All.js, that iterates through the entire collection of test units and executes them one at a time. The order of execution will be in ascending alphabetical order (by name) since the [[AutoScript#ascript.TestUnits|ArrangeBy]] collection method was called.
| |
|
| |
| ====Run Individual====
| |
|
| |
| This folder shows how to use individual scripts to execute test classes. Each script has the following form:
| |
|
| |
| ascript.TestUnits.Item('''TEST_UNIT_NAME''').Run();
| |
|
| |
| The '''TEST_UNIT_NAME''' is the name of the test unit to be run. The order and hierarchy of each script may be changed via the Studio tree control by moving the script within the '''Run Individual''' folder.
| |
|
| |
|
| [[Category: Samples]] | | [[Category: Samples]] |
Tests Description
Note: It is recommended that you read the Using Test Doubles article before proceeding in order to understand the concepts.
Basic
Test Function
This example uses a C++ test class to validate the test_func1 function under test. The dependency depend1 is left in place during the CallNoDoubling method. The dependency is replaced with a fake method, which simply returns a constant in the CallWithFake method. The dependency is replaced with a mock method, which validates the passed in parameter, in the CallWithMock method.
The intercept mangling parameters in this example, in the scl_function pragma, uses the "DEFINITION" option to indicate the the intercept will be at the function definition, and the"IMPLICIT" option because no mangling is required to intercept (because the caller and callee are in separate compilation units).
Test Function With Depend
This example uses a C++ test class to validate the test_func2 function under test. The dependency depend2 is left in place during the CallNoDoubling method. The dependency is replaced with a fake method, which simply returns a constant in the CallWithFake method. The dependency is replaced with a mock method, which validates the passed in parameter, in the CallWithMock method.
The intercept mangling parameters in this example, in the scl_function pragma, uses the "REFERENCE" option to indicate the the intercept will be at the function call, and the"EXPLICIT" option because mangling is required to intercept (because the caller and callee reside in the same source file).