Test Units Overview

From STRIDE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Introduction

STRIDE enables testing of C/C++ code through the use of xUnit-style test units. Test units can be written by developers, captured using an SCL pragma, and executed from the host. STRIDE facilitates the execution of some or all of the test units by automatically creating entry points for the execution of test units on the target.

What are STRIDE Test Units?

STRIDE Test Units is a general term for xUnit-style test modules running within the STRIDE runtime framework. These tests--written in c and c++--are compiled and linked with your embedded software and run in-place on your target hardware. They are suitable for both developer unit testing as well as ongoing regression testing.

An external Test Runner is provided which controls the execution of the tests and publishes test results to the local filesystem and optionally to S2's Internet STRIDE Test Space.


Test Unit Features

In all cases, STRIDE Test Units provide the following capabilities typical of all xUnit-style testing frameworks:

  • Specification of a test as a test method
  • Aggregation of individual tests into test suites which form execution and reporting units
  • Specification of expected results within test methods (typically by using one or more Test Macros)
  • Test fixturing (optional setup and teardown)
  • Automated execution
  • Automated results report generation

As well as these unique features:

Remote Execution
Execution and reporting controlled from a remote host, thus making the framework useful for on-target embedded system testing
Dynamic Test and Suite Generation
Test cases and suites can be created and manipulated at runtime
Test Doubles
Dynamic runtime function substitution to implement on-the-fly mocks, stubs, and doubles
Asynchronous Testing Framework
Support for testing of asynchronous activities occurring in multiple threads
Multiprocess Testing Framework
Support for testing across multiple processes running simultaneously on the target
Automatic Timing Data Collection
Automatic "time under test" collection
Automatic Results Publishing to Local Disk and Internet
Automatic publishing of test results to STRIDE Test Space

Test Unit Deployment

Test Units implement three different test deployment strategies, each of which is demonstrated in the samples:

  • test units based on C++ test classes,
  • test units based on C test functions,
  • test units based on a C language implementation of test classes (struct containing function pointers)



The required steps to get started with writing test units are as follows:

  1. Write a test unit and capture it with one of the Test Units pragmas.
  2. You may simply create a C++ class with a number of test methods and SCL capture it using scl_test_class pragma:
    // testcpp.h
    
    class Simple 
    {
    public:
        int test1() { return  0;} // PASS
        int test2() { return 23;} // FAIL <>0
        bool test3() { return true;} // PASS
        bool test4() { return false;} // FAIL
    };
    
    #ifdef _SCL
    #pragma scl_test_class(Simple)
    #endif
    

    Or, if you are writing in C, create a set of global functions and SCL capture them with scl_test_flist pragma (in more complicated scenarios when initialization is required scl_test_cclass pragma could be a better choice):

    // testc.h
    
    #ifdef __cplusplus
    extern "C" {
    #endif
    
    int test1(void) 
    {
        return 0; // PASS
    }
    
    int test2(void) 
    {
        return 23; // FAIL <>0
    }
    
    #ifdef __cplusplus
    }
    #endif
    
    #ifdef _SCL
    #pragma scl_test_flist("Simple", test1, test2)
    #endif
    
  3. Build and generate the IM code using STRIDE Build Tools:
  4. > s2scompile --c++ testcpp.h
    > s2scompile --c testc.h
    > s2sbind --output=test.sidb testcpp.h.meta testc.h.meta
    > s2sinstrument --im_name=test test.sidb
    

    If using STRIDE Studio, create a new workspace (or open an existing one), add the above source files, adjust your compiler settings, build and generate the IM manually through the UI, or write custom scripts to automate the same sequence.

  5. Build the generate IM code along with the rest of the source to create your application's binary.
  6. Download your application to the Target and start it.
  7. Execute your test units and publish results using the Test Unit Runner.
  8. > perl testunitrun.pl -u -d test.sidb
    

    If using STRIDE Studio, you can execute individual test units interactively by opening the user interface view corresponding to the test unit you would like to execute, then call it. Further more you may write a simple script to automate your test units execution and result publishing.

Requirements

Several variations on typical xUnit-style test units are supported. The additional supported features include:

  • Test status can be set using STRIDE Runtime APIs or by specifying simple return types for test methods.
  • Integral return types: 0 = PASS; <> 0 = FAIL
  • C++ bool return type: true = PASS; false = FAIL
  • void return type with no explict status setting is assumed PASS
  • Test writers can create additional child suites and tests at runtime by using Runtime APIs.
  • We do not rely on exceptions for reporting of status.
  • One of the Test Unit pragmas must be applied.

The STRIDE test class framework has the following requirements of each test class:

  • The test class must have a suitable default (no-argument) constructor.
  • The test class must have one or more public methods suitable as test methods. Allowable test methods always take no arguments (void) and return either void, simple integer types (int, short, long or char) or bool. At this time, we do not allow typedef types or macros for the return values specification.
  • The scl_test_class pragma must be applied to the class.


Simple example using return values for status

Using a Test Class

#include <srtest.h>
  
class Simple {
public:
    int tc_Int_ExpectPass() {return 0;}
    int tc_Int_ExpectFail() {return -1;}
    bool tc_Bool_ExpectPass() {return true;}
    bool tc_Bool_ExpectFail() {return false;}
};

#ifdef _SCL
#pragma scl_test_class(Simple)
#endif

Using a Test Function List

#include <srtest.h>
  
#ifdef __cplusplus
extern "C" {
#endif
  
int tf_Int_ExpectPass(void) {return 0;}
int tf_Int_ExpectFail(void) {return -1;}

#ifdef _SCL
#pragma scl_test_flist("Simple", tf_Int_ExpectPass, tf_Int_ExpectFail)
#endif
   
#ifdef __cplusplus
}
#endif

Simple example using runtime test service APIs

Using a Test Class

#include <srtest.h>
  
class RuntimeServices_basic {
public: 
  void tc_ExpectPass() 
  {
    srTestCaseAddComment(srTEST_CASE_DEFAULT, "this test should pass");
    srTestCaseSetStatus(srTEST_CASE_DEFAULT, srTEST_PASS, 0); 
  }
  void tc_ExpectFail() 
  {
    srTestCaseAddComment(srTEST_CASE_DEFAULT, "this test should fail");
    srTestCaseSetStatus(srTEST_CASE_DEFAULT, srTEST_FAIL, 0); 
  }
  void tc_ExpectInProgress() 
  {
    srTestCaseAddComment(srTEST_CASE_DEFAULT, "this test should be in progress");
  }
};

#ifdef _SCL
#pragma scl_test_class(RuntimeServices_basic)
#endif

Using a Test Function List

#include <srtest.h>
  
#ifdef __cplusplus
extern "C" {
#endif
  
void tf_ExpectPass(void) 
{
  srTestCaseAddComment(srTEST_CASE_DEFAULT, "this test should pass");
  srTestCaseSetStatus(srTEST_CASE_DEFAULT, srTEST_PASS, 0); 
}
void tf_ExpectFail(void) 
{
  srTestCaseAddComment(srTEST_CASE_DEFAULT, "this test should fail");
  srTestCaseSetStatus(srTEST_CASE_DEFAULT, srTEST_FAIL, 0); 
}
void tf_ExpectInProgress(void) 
{
  srTestCaseAddComment(srTEST_CASE_DEFAULT, "this test should be in progress");
}

#ifdef _SCL
#pragma scl_test_flist("RuntimeServices_basic", tf_ExpectPass, tf_ExpectFail, tf_ExpectInProgress)
#endif
 
#ifdef __cplusplus
}
#endif

Simple example using srTest base class

#include <srtest.h>
  
class MyTest : public stride::srTest {
public:
  void tc_ExpectPass() 
  {
    testCase.AddComment("this test should pass");
    testCase.SetStatus(srTEST_PASS, 0); 
  }
  void tc_ExpectFail() 
  {
    testCase.AddComment("this test should fail");
    testCase.SetStatus(srTEST_FAIL, 0); 
  }
  void tc_ExpectInProgress() 
  {
    testCase.AddComment("this test should be in progress");
  }
  int tc_ChangeMyName() 
  {
    testCase.AddComment("this test should have name = MyChangedName");
    testCase.SetName("MyChangedName");
    return 0;
  }
  int tc_ChangeMyDescription() 
  {
    testCase.AddComment("this test should have a description set");
    testCase.SetDescription("this is my new description");
    return 0;
  }
};

#ifdef _SCL
#pragma scl_test_class(MyTest)
#endif


Test Macros

The STRIDE Test Unit implementation also provides a set of Test Macros (declared in srtest.h) available for use within test methods. The macros are optional - you are not required to use them in your test units. They provide shortcuts for testing assertions and automatic report annotation in the case of failures.

The macros can be used in C++ and C test unit code (Note that there is no C version of exceptions test).

General guidelines for all macros

srEXPECT_xx macros will set the current test case to fail (if it hasn’t already been set) and produce an annotation in the report if the expectation fails. If the expectation succeeds, there is no action.

srASSERT_xx macros will set the current test case to fail (if it hasn’t already been set) and insert an annotation into the report if the assertion fails. In addition, a return from the current function will occur. srASSERT_xx macros can only be used in test functions which return void. If the assertion succeeds there is no action.

srLOG macro will add a new comment to the current test case and produce an annotation in the report with specified level of importance.

The report annotation produced by a failed macro always includes the source file and line along with details about the condition that failed and the failing values.

Boolean Macros

The boolean macros take a single condition expression, cond, that evaluates to an integral type or bool. The condition will be evaluated once. if cond evaluates to non-zero the assertion or expectation fails. When a failure occurs the report will be annotated.

Boolean
srEXPECT_TRUE(cond); srASSERT_TRUE(cond); cond is true
srEXPECT_FALSE(cond); srASSERT_FALSE(cond); cond is false

Comparison Macros

Comparison macros take two operands and compare them using the indicated operator. The comparison macros will work for primitive types as well as objects that have the corresponding comparison operator implemented.

Comparison
srEXPECT_EQ(val1, val2); srASSERT_EQ(val1, val2); val1 == val2
srEXPECT_NE(val1, val2); srASSERT_NE(val1, val2); val1 != val2
srEXPECT_LT(val1, val2); srASSERT_LT(val1, val2); val1 < val2
srEXPECT_LE(val1, val2); srASSERT_LE(val1, val2); val1 <= val2
srEXPECT_GT(val1, val2); srASSERT_GT(val1, val2); val1 > val2
srEXPECT_GE(val1, val2); srASSERT_GE(val1, val2); val1 >= val2

C String Comparison Macros

C String Comparison Macros are intended only for use with C-style zero terminated strings. The strings can be char or wchar_t based. In particular, these macros should not be used for object of one or other string class, since such classes have overloaded comparison operators. The standard comparison macros should be used instead.

  • An empty string will appear in error message output as “”. A null string will appear as NULL with no surrounding quotes. Otherwise all output strings are quoted.
  • The type of str1 and str2 must be compatible with const char* or const wchar_t*.
C-string comparison
srEXPECT_STREQ(str1, str2); srASSERT_STREQ(str1, str2); str1 and str2 have the same content
srEXPECT_STRNE(str1, str2); srASSERT_STRNE(str1, str2); str1 and str2 have different content
srEXPECT_STRCASEEQ(str1, str2); srASSERT_STRCASEEQ(str1, str2); str1 and str2 have the same content, ignoring case.
srEXPECT_STRCASENE(str1, str2); srASSERT_STRCASENE(str1, str2); str1 and str2 have different content, ignoring case.

Exception Macros

Exception macros are used to ensure that expected exceptions are thrown. They require exception support from the target compiler. If the target compiler does not have exception support the macros cannot be used and must be disabled.

Exceptions
srEXPECT_THROW(statement, ex_type); srASSERT_THROW(statement, ex_type); statement throws an exception of type ex_type
srEXPECT_THROW_ANY(statement); srASSERT_THROW_ANY(statement); statement throws an exception (type not important)
srEXPECT_NO_THROW(statement); srASSERT_NO_THROW(statement); statement does not throw an exception

Predicate Macros

Predicate macros allow user control over the pass/fail decision making in a macro. A predicate is a function returning bool that is implemented by the user but passed to the macro. Other arguments for the predicate are also passed to the macro. The macros allow for predicate functions with up to four parameters.

Predicates
srEXPECT_PRED1(pred, val1) srASSERT_PRED1(pred, val1) pred(val1) returns true
srEXPECT_PRED2(pred, val1, val2) srASSERT_PRED2(pred, val1, val2) pred(val1, val2) returns true
…(up to arity of 4)

All predicate macros require a predicate function function which returns bool. The predicate macros allow functions with one to 4 parameters. Following are the report annotations resulting from expectation or assertion failures.

Floating Point Comparison Macros

Floating point macros are for comparing equivalence (or near equivalence) of floating point numbers. These macros are necessary since because equivalence comparisons for floating point numbers will often fail due to round-off errors.

Floating Point comparison
srEXPECT_NEAR(val1, val2, epsilon); srASSERT_NEAR(val1, val2, epsilon); The absolute value of the difference between val1 and val2 is epsilon.

Log Macros

Log macros allow message logging with level of importance - error, warning, or info.

Note that the srLOG() macro can be used in threads other than the thread that a test is running on.

Logging
srLOG_ERROR(message) message is a char* to a null-terminated string
srLOG_WARNING(message) message is a char* to a null-terminated string
srLOG_INFO(message) message is a char* to a null-terminated string

Dynamic Test Case Macros

The macros presented so far are not capable of dealing with dynamic test cases. In order to handle dynamic test cases, each of the macros requires another parameter which is the test case to report against. Other than this, these macros provide exactly equivalent functionality to the non-dynamic peer. The dynamic macros are listed below. All require a test case, value of type srTestCaseHandle_t from srtest.h, to be passed as the first parameter).

Nonfatal assertion Fatal Assertion
Boolean
srEXPECT_TRUE_DYN(tc, cond); srASSERT_TRUE_DYN(tc, cond);
srEXPECT_FALSE_DYN(tc, cond); srASSERT_FALSE_DYN(tc, cond);
Comparison
srEXPECT_EQ_DYN(tc, val1, val2); srASSERT_EQ_DYN(tc, expect, val);
srEXPECT_NE_DYN(tc, val1, val2); srASSERT_NE_DYN(tc, val1, val2);
srEXPECT_LT_DYN(tc, val1, val2); srASSERT_LT_DYN(tc, val1, val2);
srEXPECT_LE_DYN(tc, val1, val2); srASSERT_LE_DYN(tc, val1, val2);
srEXPECT_GT_DYN(tc, val1, val2); srASSERT_GT_DYN(tc, val1, val2);
srEXPECT_GE_DYN(tc, val1, val2); srASSERT_GE_DYN(tc, val1, val2);
C-string comparison
srEXPECT_STREQ_DYN(tc, str1, str2); srASSERT_STREQ_DYN(tc, str1, str2);
srEXPECT_STRNE_DYN(tc, str1, str2); srASSERT_STRNE_DYN(tc, str1, str2);
srEXPECT_STRCASEEQ_DYN(tc, str1, str2); srASSERT_STRCASEEQ_DYN(tc, str1, str2);
srEXPECT_STRCASENE_DYN(tc, str1, str2); srASSERT_STRCASENE_DYN(tc, str1, str2);
Exceptions
srEXPECT_THROW_DYN(statement, ex_type); srASSERT_THROW_DYN(tc, statement, ex_type);
srEXPECT_THROW_ANY_DYN(tc, statement); srASSERT_THROW_ANY_DYN(tc, statement);
srEXPECT_NO_THROW_DYN(tc, statement); srASSERT_NO_THROW_DYN(tc, statement);
Predicates
srEXPECT_PRED1_DYN(tc, pred, val1); srASSERT_PRED1_DYN(tc, pred, val1);
srEXPECT_PRED2_DYN(tc, pred, vall, val2); srASSERT_PRED2_DYN(tc, pred, vall, val2);
…(up to arity of 4)
Floating Point
srEXPECT_NEAR_DYN(tc, val1, val2, epsilon); srASSERT_NEAR_DYN(tc, val1, val2, epsilon);
Logging
srLOG_DYN(tc, level, message);

Use operator << for report annotation (C++ tests only)

In C++ test code all macros support the adding to the report annotations using the << operator. For example:

srEXPECT_TRUE(a != b) << "My custom message";

As delivered, the macros will support stream input annotations for all numeric types, "C" string (char* or wchar_t*) and types allowing implicit cast to numeric type or "C" string. The user may overload the << operator in order to annotate reports using any custom type. An example is below.

The following will compile and execute successfully given that the << operator is overloaded as shown:

#include <srtest.h>

// MyCustomClass implementation
class MyCustomClass
{
public:
   MyCustomClass(int i) : m_int(i) {}

private: 
   int m_int; 
   friend stride::Message& operator<<(stride::Message& ss, const MyCustomClass& obj);
}; 

stride::Message& operator<<(stride::Message& ss, const MyCustomClass& obj)
{
   ss << obj.m_int;
   return ss;
}

void test()
{
    MyCustomClass custom(34); 

    srEXPECT_FALSE(true) << custom;
}

Using Testpoints

Testpoints are covered in the article Using Testpoints.

Scripting a Test Unit

To automate the execution and reporting of a Test Unit a script is required. Scripts can be written by hand or automatically generated using the Script Wizard and a corresponding template script. A scripting tool for executing a test unit is the AutoScript TestUnits collection. An Ascript TestUnit object assembles all of the reporting information for the test unit and its corresponding test methods.

  • Require usage of the AutoScript TestUnits collection
  • Can be written by hand (refer below)
  • Can leverage Templates via the Script Wizard
  • Order of multiple test units dictated by SUID assignment


Single test unit example

The following example script is used to harness a test unit that has been captured using #pragma scl_test_class(Simple).

JavaScript

var tu = ascript.TestUnits.Item("Simple");
// Ensure test unit exists
if (tu != null) 
  tu.Run();

Perl

use strict;
use Win32::OLE;
Win32::OLE->Option(Warn => 3);
   
my $tu = $main::ascript->TestUnits->Item("Simple");
if (defined $tu) {
  $tu->Run();
}

Multiple test units example

The following example script is used to harness two test units that have been captured using #pragma scl_test_class(Simple1) and #pragma scl_test_class(Simple2).

JavaScript

var Units = ["Simple1","Simple2"];
  
// iterate through each function
for (i in Units)
{
  var tu = ascript.TestUnits.Item(Units[i]);
  if ( tu != null ) 
    tu.Run();
}

Perl

use strict;
use Win32::OLE;
Win32::OLE->Option(Warn => 3);
   
# initialize an array with all selected function names
my @UnitNames = ("Simple1","Simple2");
foreach (@UnitNames) {   
  my $tu = $main::ascript->TestUnits->Item($_->[1]);
  die "TestUnit not found: $_->[1]\n" unless (defined $tu);
  $tu->Run();
}